Social issues in the Canterbury Tales.

As an extraordinary bouquet in medieval literature of Britain, Chaucer's The Canterbury tales indicate a lot of information about that moment. God granted the poet paints a vivid picture of the whole community with his wonderful professional knowledge with countless linguistic style. 

The Wife of Bath's tale is one of the most popular stories in this tremendous work.  The model of the woman little strange but impressive. She had a skill to making clothes, and she crossed many foreign places.  She could explain much of wandering. In modern people's psyche, the wife must be a superwoman, so, she was in that period. In her story, Alisoun indicates her powerful desire of controlling the family. This sort of appetency expresses women's pressure to expand their social position and can be the auspice of female awakening. Women are coming to be self-aware and want to be geniuses of themselves. Even their lovers or husband too. The story is remembered in Malory's Le Morte D'Arthur. Chaucer and Malory both obtained portions from widely dissipate folk tales.

We can easily visualize the social foundation of that impression. Women were yelling for more freedoms, then such kind of tales occurred, social state is forever the dirt of literature. While Malory's tale feasible to be a sentimental love story rather than an intelligent tale, and Chaucer's work look like extremely valuable at that stage. He is an announcer to the issue of female freedom. But I was confused by those Medieval novels. A Lady was powerful over her knight, females in it were highly reputable, then why did women compel for more respective? Unfortunately, the authentic history was not so poetic. That's why known as 'Courtly Love' that nobilities in a middle-age screamed up was idealistic but dangerous, shadowy, and irresponsible at the same time There vacuous lives relaxation was love games. Women were extra of cherished interests than someones who have their ideas. According to those gentlemen. They had a seeming religious position, grace, dignity, beauty, all these were an aspect of a dame. The fact was even more terrible. The Physician's Tale conveys some information. In this household drama all about the connection between the daughter and father. Virginia is a victim. Neither Apius nor her father looks after about the needy girls desire. They want to conquer her in an extreme way.

Finally, the cruel and impassable father compels her right to life. Consequently, Alisoun wants to supervise her residence to dominate her own life. In the clerk's tale, Griselda the wife of a Marquis emerges as the antithesis to the wife of bath. What she only can commit is accepting all her husband's cruel impulses which are used to test her loyalty passively. Griselda as a woman and cheap peasant absolutely the weak. Maybe her limitless docility, grit, and obedience, all these virtues are never come from love, but generating pressure from male strength and economical reason. In medieval Britain in the male-dominated nation, a man often wished the woman to be their appendant, so this sort of stupid story could fulfill as the standard for wide conduct. The end of the tale is extremely ironical, Walter and Griselda live cheerfully ever. But the fact is the male kingdom was reducing and the seeds of feminism we're gesturing. It can be deduced that the social situations were not so strict for women in Alisoun. The flower of capitalism in western Europe and the Renaissance in Italy impacted every behavior life. As a female trader, Alisoun's experience is incredible. She obtains what she wants more or less. Maybe Chaucer was informed of the movements and wrote this story. 

Another vital issue within the Canterbury Tales and the wider 14th-century world is the corruption of the Catholic Church. There are two superficial conflicts in the tales. One brings place between the friar and the summoner unlike the miller and the reeve who tell tales that disturb others and do not get on for the explanation. The friar and the summoner have a longstanding bitterness between them. Chaucer published the sham and odiousness of the church in their ultimate narration. The friar denigrates the summoner with his colorful description of his work, which comprises corruption, cheating, and bribery. The important clerical office appears more like a 14th-century safety racket in his tale. He distinguishes the summoned to the daemon from hell, and even more darned than the daemon. He implies that the friars are sermonising and manage to live well despite vows of poverty by describing a friar who inquires a sick man to share the wealth with him. The pardoner is a controversial character in the tales. He addresses the pilgrims a sermon after telling his own sin in the prologue. As Chaucer characterized he is strange, and he has a face as flat as it was lately shaved. The pardoner is eunuch. We can describe in relation to this figure with the prioress.